For Midwife Educators: Evaluation Methods in Clinical Practices

Authors

  • Öznur ŞİMŞEK BULGULU Öznur ŞİMŞEK BULGULU

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8165496

Keywords:

Clinical Practice, Evaluation Methods, Midwife, Midwifery Education, Midwife Educator

Abstract

Methods that provide active participation and holistic development of the student should be used in midwifery education. Clinical applications, one of these methods, have a critical importance in midwifery education. With clinical applications, a midwifery student has the opportunity to build knowledge, skills, abilities, confidence and midwifery identity. For this reason, midwifery students should be prepared and evaluated with clinical practice training in order to provide quality midwifery care services. With the evaluations, the learning levels and developmental stages of the students are determined. In general, educators evaluate students by observing when they teach or treat patients. However, with this assessment method, the student cannot be evaluated in every way, and as a result, they are exposed to an inconsistent scoring system based only on the individual observation of the educator. Instead, assessment methods that provide clear and understandable written feedback to both students and educators should be preferred. With the feedback given, the student will have the opportunity to develop his/her skills by noticing where his/her deficiencies or mistakes are. There are several proven assessment methods that offer quality feedback. With this study, it is aimed to present some clinical evaluation methods that midwife educators can use in the form of compilation while evaluating midwifery students in clinical practice.

References

Ahmad C, Ahmad N, Bakar A. (2009). Assessing nursing clinical skills performance using objective structured clinical examination (OsCE) for open distance learning students in Open university Malaysia. ınternational Conference on ınformation (ıCı); kuala lumpur, August 12-13, 2009; p.195-203

Akaltan K. F. (2019). Diş Hekimliği Eğitiminde Beceri ve Yeterliğin Değerlendirilmesi II: Değerlendirme Yöntemleri. Selcuk Dental Journal. 2019, 6(5): 72-91.

Alkhateeb N, Salih AM, Shabila N, Al-Dabbagh A. (2022). Objective structured clinical examination: Challenges and opportunities from students' perspective. PLoS One. 2022, 2;17(9):e0274055.

Alomar AZ. (2022). Perception and Satisfaction of Undergraduate Medical Students of the Mini Clinical Evaluation Exercise Implementation in Orthopedic Outpatient Setting. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2022,13: 1159-1170.

Alsaid AH, Al-Sheikh M. (2016). Student and Faculty Perception of Objective Structured Clinical Examination: A Teaching Hospital Experience. Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2017 Jan-Apr;5(1):49-55. doi: 10.4103/1658-631X.194250. Epub 2016 Nov 16. PMID: 30787752; PMCID: PMC6298287.

Altıntaş L, Alimoğlu M.K. (2012). Takım çalışmasına dayalı öğrenme. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası Derg, 2012, 33: 19–41.

Ay F. (2007). Hemşirelik eğitiminde kullanılan alternatif bir araç: Portfolyo. Fırat Sağlık Hizmetleri Dergisi, 2007, Cilt:2, Sayı:4.

Bulut İ, Sabancı A, Kara İ.H. (2015). Tıp eğitiminde kullanılan ölçme ve değerlendirme araçlarının geleneksel ve alternatif ölçme ve değerlendirme araçları olarak sınıflandırılması. Journal Of Medical Education And Informatics, 2015, 1(1). 02-11 Sayfa No: 3.

Cormack C.L, Jensen E, Durham C.O, Smith G, Dumas B. (2018). The 360-degree evaluation model: A method for assessing competency in graduate nursing students. A pilot research study. Nurse Education Today, 2018, 64:132–137.

Demirağ, H. , Göktaş, Ş. , Yıldırım, E. , Tamgül, M. , Gökçe, M. & Akkaya, T. (2018). Objektif Yapılandırılmış Klinik Sınavı (OYKS) Kullanarak Paramedik Öğrencilerin Mesleki Becerilerinin Değerlendirilmesi . Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 7 (4), 65-73. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/gumussagbil/issue/41325/451506

Denat Y, Tuğrul E. (2012). Klinik Beceri Performanslarını Değerlendirmede Bir Yöntem: Objektif Yapılandırılmış Klinik Sınavlar. Hemşirelikte Eğitim ve Araştırma Dergis, 2012, 9 (3): 53-59.

Driscoll, J. ve Teh, B. (2001). ‘The contribution of portfolios and Professional development’, Jouarnal of Orthopaedic Nuersing, 2001, 5:151-156.

Eskiocak S, Gökmen SS, Erbaş H, Çakır E, Gülen Ş. (2005). Biyokimyada nesnel yapılandırılmış pratik sınav (OSPE). Türk Biyokimya Dergisi, 2005, 30 (2):174-177.

Fidan UM, Sak IM. (2012). İlköğretim öğretmenlerinin tamamlayıcı ölçme değerlendirme teknikleri hakkında görüşleri. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2012, 1(1): 174-189.

Griffiths, M., Fenwick, J., Gamble, J., & Creedy, D. K. (2019). Midwifery Student Evaluation of Practice: The MidSTEP tool — Perceptions of clinical learning experiences. Women and Birth. doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2019.09.01.

González-Gil MT, Parro-Moreno AI, Oter-Quintana C, González-Blázquez C, Martínez-Marcos M, Casillas-Santana M, Arlandis-Casanova A, Canalejas-Pérez C. (2020). 360-Degree evaluation: Towards a comprehensive, integrated assessment of performance on clinical placement in nursing degrees: A descriptive observational study. Nurse Educ Today, 2020. Dec; 95:104594. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104594. Epub 2020 Sep 11. PMID: 32979748.

Heeneman S, Driessen EW. (2017). The use of a portfolio in postgraduate medical education - reflect, assess and account, one for each or all in one? GMS J Med Educ. 2017 Nov 15;34(5):Doc57. doi: 10.3205/zma001134. PMID: 29226225; PMCID: PMC5704619.

Johnson C. (2009). Team-Based Learning for Health Professions Education: A Guide to Using Small Groups for Improving Learning. J Chiropr Educ. 2009 Spring; 23(1):47–8.

Joshi T, Budhathoki P, Adhikari A, Poudel A, Raut S, Shrestha DB. (2022). Team-Based Learning Among Health Care Professionals: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2022 Jan 14;14(1):e21252. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21252. PMID: 35178311; PMCID: PMC8842312

McAleer S, Walker R. (1990). Objective structured clinical examination (OsCE). Occas Pap r coll gen Pract, 1990, 46: 39-42

Michaelsen LK, Sweet M, Parmelee DX. (2009). The essential elements of TBL in Team-Based Learning: Small Group Learning's Next Big Step: New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 116. Published online in Wiley InterScience, 2009.

Michaelsen LK. (2008). Team-based learning for health professions education: A guide to using small groups for improving learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, 2008.

Miller A. (2010). Impact of workplace based assessment on doctors’ education and performance: a systematic review. BMJ 2010, 341:c5064.

Mitchell, M. L., Henderson, A., Groves, M., Dalton, M., Nulty, D. (2009) The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): optimising its value in the undergraduate nursing curriculum. Nurse Educ Today, 29(4), 398-404.

Nagatsu T, Kayauchi N, Satoh H. (2022). Inter-Professıonal 360-Degree Evaluatıon Of The Performance Of Intensıve Care Unıt Nurses. Georgian Med News. 2022 Oct;(331):46-53. PMID: 36539130.

Norcini JJ. (2005). The Mini Clinical Evaluation Exercise (miniCEX). The clinical teacher, 2005, 2: 25-30.

Özden D, Gürol Arslan G, Ertuğrul B, Adanır A. (2022). Hemşirelik Öğrencilerinin Objektif Yapılandırılmış Klinik Sınav Becerisinin Teorik ve Uygulama Başarısı ile lişkisi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 2022, 15 (4): 487-506 . DOI: 10.46483/deuhfed.1002039

Rassin M, Sinler D, Ehrenfeld M. (2006). ‘Departmental portfolio in nursing An advanced instrument’, Nurse Education in Practice, 2006, 6: 55-60.

Rushforth H. E. (2007). Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): review of literature and implications for nursing education. Nurse Educ Today, 2007, 27 (5): 481-490.

Sadeghi T, Loripoor M. (2016). Usefulness of 360 degree evaluation in evaluating nursing students in Iran. Korean J Med Educ. 2016 Jun;28(2):195-200. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2016.22. Epub 2016 Feb 25. PMID: 26913770; PMCID: PMC4951738.

The mini-CEX A quality tool in evaluation. American Board of Internal Medicine. Information page on the mini-CEX. (2023). Available at: www.abim.org/program-directors-administrators/assessment- tool/mini-cex.asp Last accessed: May 14, 2023.

Ünver V. (2007). GATA Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu öğrencilerinin laboratuar ve klinik beceri eğitimlerini geliştirmeye yönelik model oluşturma. GATA Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü İç Hastalıkları Hemşireliği Anabilim Dalı, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi 2007, Ankara.

Van Tartwijk J, Driessen EW. (2009). Portfolios for assessment and learning: AMEE Guide no. 45. Med Teach. 2009 Sep;31(9):790-801. doi: 10.1080/01421590903139201. PMID: 19811183.

Yoo DM, Cho AR, Kim S. (2020). Development and validation of a portfolio assessment system for medical schools in Korea. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020, 17:39. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.39. Epub 2020 Dec 9. PMID: 33291206; PMCID: PMC7859386.

Yoo DM, Cho AR, Kim S. (2019). Evaluation of a portfolio-based course on self-development for pre-medical students in Korea. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2019;16:38. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2019.16.38. Epub 2019 Dec 11.

Zayyan M. (2011). Objective structured clinical examination: the assessment of choice. Oman Med J. 2011, 26 (4): 219-22. doi: 10.5001/omj.2011.55. PMID: 22043423; PMCID: PMC3191703.

American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM), 2023. Erişim Adresi: https://www.abim.org/program-directors-administrators/assessment-tools/mini-cex.aspx. Erişim tarihi: 24.05.2023

Published

2023-07-17

How to Cite

ŞİMŞEK BULGULU, Öznur. (2023). For Midwife Educators: Evaluation Methods in Clinical Practices. WORLD WOMEN STUDIES JOURNAL, 8(1), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8165496

Issue

Section

Articles