An Analysis of The Most Cited Articles on “Women Managers” in Business and Management Journals within The Scope of Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI): A Qualitative Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14585971Keywords:
Descriptive Analysis, Bibliometric Analysis, Female Manager, ManagerAbstract
This study aims to analyze the most cited scientific publications on the theme of “women managers” in business and management journals within the scope of the Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) in the Web of Science (WoS) database. For this purpose, the search criteria “topic”, “article”, “article”, “Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)”, and “management or business” were determined in the database and a search was conducted with the keywords “women executives”, “female executives”, “female managers”, “women managers”, which are the English translations of the concept of “women managers”. As a result of the search, the first 25 most cited articles out of 477 articles that met these criteria were analyzed according to the year of publication, the journal in which they were published, the number of citations, the impact factor of the journal, the type of research used, the purpose, outcome and sample group information, and the most effective author collaborations and keywords. According to the findings obtained as a result of the analysis, it was determined that most studies were written in 1994 and 2016, and the studies were mostly published in the “Journal of Applied Psychology” and “Academy of Management Journal” journals originating from the United States of America, the journal with the highest impact factor was Academy Of Management Annals (22.2), quantitative research methods were mostly preferred, the highest number of citations belonged to Heilman and Okimoto (2007) with 547, and general information about the purpose, sample and results of the studies was given. However, it was concluded that “gender”, “leadership”, “glass cliff” and “women” were the most frequently used common keywords, the author who conducted the most collaborative studies was “S. Alexander Haslam”, and the most influential countries were “UK”, “Austria” and “USA”. Based on the findings, of this study, which aims to create a framework for the development of the “female manager” phenomenon in the business and management literature, a general profile of the most cited scientific publications on the subject was created and suggestions were given to the relevant researchers for future research.
References
Acker, J. (1992). From sex roles to gendered institutions. Contemporary Sociology, 21(5), 565-569. https://doi.org/10.2307/2075528.
Akman, G. İ., & Akman, Y. (2016). Kraliçe arı sendromu bağlamında kadın öğretmenlerin kadın yöneticilere ilişkin görüşleri. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 5(3), 748-763. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.v5i3.5000195251.
Akkaş, İ. (2019). Cinsiyet ve toplumsal cinsiyet kavramları çerçevesinde ortaya çıkan toplumsal cinsiyet ayrımcılığı. Ekev Akademi Dergisi, 23(77), 97-118.
Akbulut, D., & Yavuz, E. (2022). Örgütlerde toksik liderlik davranışı: Betimsel içerik analizi. Uluslararası Liderlik Çalışmaları Dergisi: Kuram ve Uygulama, 5(2), 107-122. https://doi.org/10.52848/ijls.1097752.
Akyürek, M. İ. (2022). Eğitim yönetimi alanında yayımlanan araştırmaların eğilimleri: Betimsel içerik analizi. Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(33), 324-341. https://doi.org/10.35675/befdergi.774620.
Ashworth, R., Krøtel, S. M. L., & Villadsen, A. R. (2023). Right time to join? Organizational imprinting and women's careers in public service organizations. Gender, Work & Organization, 30(3), 773-792.
Bian, L., Leslie, S. J., & Cimpian, A. (2017). Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children’s interests. Science, 355(6323), 389-391. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah6524.
Broadus, R. (1987). Toward a definition of “bibliometrics”. Scientometrics, 12(56), 373–379.
Çelik, C., Kaymakcı, G., & Can, Ş. (2023). Özel yetenekli öğrencilerin kariyer gelişimine yönelik araştırmaların bibliyometrik analizi/bibliometric analysis of research on career development of gifted students. E-Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14(2), 68-82.
Çilci, T. (2022). Türkiye'de 2000-2019 yılları arasında Cam Tavan kavramı ile ilgili yayınlanmış tezlerin betimsel analizi (Master's thesis, Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü).
Cordano, M., Scherer, R. F., & Owen, C. L. (2002). Attitudes toward women as managers: Sex versus culture. Women in Management Review, 17(2), 51-60. https://doi.org/10.1108/09649420210421754.
Cotter, D. A., Hermsen, J. M., Ovadia, S., & Vanneman, R. (2001). The glass ceiling effect. Social forces, 80(2), 655-681. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2001.0091.
Corsun, D. L., & Costen, W. M. (2001). Is the glass ceiling unbreakable? Habitus, fields, and the stalling of women and minorities in management. Journal of Management Inquiry, 10(1), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/105649260110100.
Çalık, M., & Sözbilir, M. (2014). İçerik analizinin parametreleri. Eğitim ve Bilim, 39 (174), 33-38.
Dinçer, S. (2018). Content analysis in scientific research: Meta-analysis, meta-synthesis, and descriptive content analysis, Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 7(1), 176-190. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.363159.
Eagly, A. H., & Mladinic, A. (1994). Are people prejudiced against women? some answers from research on attitudes, gender stereotypes, and judgments of competence. European Review of Social Psychology, 5(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779543000002.
Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?. Scientometrics, 105, 1809-1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z.
Ekin, O., Demir, Y., Erden, Ö., & Erol. (2022). Kadın Yöneticilerin Liderlik Özellikleri Üzerine Yapılan Lisansüstü Çalışmaların Doküman Analizi İle İncelenmesi. Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi, 9(4), 1760-1777. https://doi.org/10.46868/atdd.174.
Erivan, R., Villatte, G., Ollivier, M., Reina, N., Descamps, S., & Boisgard, S. (2019). The top 100 most-cited orthopaedics & traumatology: Surgery & research articles. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, 105(8), 1459-1462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2019.01.016.
Eroğlu, F., & İrdem, Ş. (2016). Toplumsal cinsiyet ayrımcılığı ve yönetim kademelerindeki yansımaları, Pamukkale İşletme ve Bilişim Yönetimi Dergisi, (2), 11-35. https://doi.org/10.5505/pibyd.2016.70288.
Feng, J., Zhang, Y. Q., & Zhang, H. (2017). Improving the co-word analysis method based on semantic distance. Scientometrics, 111(3), 1521–1531.
Gilligan, C. (1993). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard University Press.
Güner, D., & Oktay, K. (2021). Turizm alanındaki bilimsel dergilerin dergi etki faktörleri ve citescore değerleri üzerine bir inceleme. Turizm Akademik Dergisi, 8(1), 1-14.
Halaçlı, B., & Karaalp-Orhan, H. S. (2022). Cinsiyete dayalı ücret eşitsizliği: İşveren yönlü bir analiz. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, (61), 65-90. https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.973090.
Hudson, K. (2007). The new labor market segmentation: Labor market Dualism in the new economy, Social Science Research, 36(1), 286-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2005.11.005.
Huang, D. W. (2017). Impact factor distribution revisited. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 482, 173-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2017.04.038.
İmamoğlu, S. Z., Serhat, E. R. A. T., ve Taşcı, V. (2022). Gelişen ekonomilerde sosyal inovasyon ve milli yenilik sistemlerini inceleyen araştırmaların betimsel içerik analizi, Beykent Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 15(2), 47-61.
Karakaya, Ş., & REYHANOGLU, M. (2020). Erkek egemen dünyada kadın yönetici olmak: Kadın yönetici çevresi üzerine bir araştırma. Journal of Politics Economy and Management, 3(1), 47-74.
Karatepe, S., & Arıbaş, N. N. (2017). İş hayatında kadın yöneticilere ilişkin cinsiyet ayrımcılığı: Türkiye için bir değerlendirme. Yasama Dergisi, (31), 7-23.
Kontaş, Z., & Özen, F. (2024). Toplumsal cinsiyet algısının kadın yöneticilere karşı tutumlara etkisi: eğitim örgütleri örneği. Uluslararası Eğitime Özgün Bakış Dergisi, 2(1), 35-62. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10611526.
Kutlu, G., & Akbulut, Y. (2020). Attitudes towards female managers in hospitals: Case study of Turkey. International Journal of Healthcare Management, 13(1), 212–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/20479700.2018.1498219.
Kübra, E. K. E., & Özçelik, A. D. Ö. (2024). Türkiye’deki sosyal zekâ konulu araştırmaların eğilimleri: Bir betimsel analiz çalışması. Journal of Current Debates In Socıal Scıences (Cudes), 7 (1), 80-90. https://doi.org/10.29228/cudes.74665.
Kütükcü, A. (2017). Türkiye’de kadın liderlik alanında yapılan lisansüstü tezlerin incelenmesi. Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi, (15), 26-47.
Landström, H., Harirchi, G., & Åström, F. (2012). Entrepreneurship: Exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy, 41(7), 1154-1181.
Mattis, M. C. (2004). Women entrepreneurs: Out from under the glass ceiling. Women in management review, 19(3), 154-163. . https://doi.org/10.1108/09649420410529861.
Makal, A. (2011). Türkiye’de 1950-1965 Döneminde ücretli kadın emeğine ilişkin gelişmeler. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 56(2). 117-155.
McCammon, H. J., Campbell, K. E., Granberg, E. M., & Mowery, C. (2001). How movements win: Gendered opportunity structures and US women's suffrage movements, 1866 to 1919. American sociological review, 66(1), 49-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122401066001.
Mizrahi, R., & Aracı, H. (2010). Kadın yöneticiler ve cam tavan sendromu üzerine bir araştırma. Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(1), 149-156.
Moi, T. (1999). What is a woman? and other essays, New York: Oxford University Press
Merigó, J. M., & Yang, J. B. (2017). A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science. Omega, 73, 37-48.
Negiz, N., & Yemen, A. (2011). Kamu örgütlerinde kadın yöneticiler: Yönetici ve çalışan açısından yönetimde kadın sorunsalı. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2011(24), 195-214.
Okan, K. O. Ç. (2020). Web of Science üzerinde indekslenen kadına yönelik şiddet araştırmalarına bibliyometrik bir bakış. İstanbul Üniversitesi Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi, (21), 19-35. https://doi.org/10.26650/iukad.2020.22.002.
Öztan, E., & Doğan, S. N. (2015). Akademinin cinsiyeti: Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi örneği üzerinden üniversite ve toplumsal cinsiyet. Çalışma ve Toplum, 3(46), 191-222.
Paşaoğlu, D., Tokgöz, N., Şakar, N., Ergun Özler, N. D., & Özalp, İ., (2013). Yönetim ve Organizasyon, T.C. Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayını No: 2944, Açıköğretim Fakültesi Yayını No: 1900, Ocak 2013.
Pollock, A., & Berge, E. (2018). How to do a systematic review. International Journal of Stroke, 13(2), 138-156. ttps://doi.org/10.1177/17474930177437.
Powell, G. N., Butterfield, D. A., & Parent, J. D. (2002). Gender and managerial stereotypes: Have the times changed?. Journal of Management, 28(2), 177-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(01)00136-2.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, N. P., & Bachrach, D. G. (2008). Scholarly influence in the field of management: A bibliometric analysis of the determinants of university and author impact in the management literature in the past quarter century. Journal of Management, 34(4), 641-720.
Poma, E., & Pistoresi, B. (2024). Do women on boards break the glass ceiling or face the glass cliff?. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 24(8), 22-45.
Ruble, T. L., Cohen, R. & Ruble, D. N. (1984), Sex Stereotypes: Occupational Barriers For Women, American Behavioral Scientist, 27(3), 339-356. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276484027003006.
Ryan, M. K., Haslam, S. A., Hersby, M. D., & Bongiorno, R. (2011). Think crisis–think female: The glass cliff and contextual variation in the think manager–think male stereotype. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 470-484. https://doi.org/10.1037/A0022133.
Schein, V. E. (1975). Relationships between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics among female managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(3), 340–344. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076637.
Schein, V. E. (2001). A global look at psychological barriers to women's progress in management. Journal of Social issues, 57(4), 675-688. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00235.
Suharnomo, S., & Permatasari, D. (2019). Investigating the “queen bee” phenomenon in Indonesia: A case study. Diponegoro International Journal of Business, 2(1), 41-51.
Suri, H., & Clarke, D. (2009). Advancements in research synthesis methods: From a methodologically inclusive perspective, Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 395-430.
Sonnenwald, D. H. (2007). Scientific collaboration. Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol., 41(1), 643-681.
Şarkaya, S. S., & Çobanoğlu, F. (2020). Kaosun eşiğinde kadın yönetici: Cam uçurum. IBAD Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 675-694.
Jackson, C.J. (2001). Women Middle managers’ perception of the glass ceiling, Women In Management Review, 16(1), 30-4.
Tai, A. J. R., & Sims, R. L. (2005). The perception of the glass ceiling in high technology companies. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 12(1), 16-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/10717919050120010.
Uyanık, Y. (1999). Dualist (ikili) işgücü piyasası teorisi. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(3), (1) 1-8.
Utma, S. (2019). Kadına yönelik cinsiyet ayrımcılığı ve cam tavan sendromu. Sosyal ve Beşerî Bilimler Dergisi, 11(1), 44-58.
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2013). VOSviewer manual. Leiden: Univeristeit Leiden, 1(1), 1-53.
Yang, L. K., Connolly, L., & Connolly, J. M. (2022). Is there a glass cliff in local government management? Examining the hiring and departure of women. Public Administration Review, 82(3), 570-584.
Yıldız, S., Alhas, F., Sakal, Ö., & Yıldız, H. (2016). Cam uçurum: Kadın yöneticiler cam tavanı ne zaman aşar?. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 71(4), 1119-1146.
Zandria, S., Junior, Z. L. K., & Hennie, P. (2020). Queen bee syndrome at the workplace; Perspectives of female business students at a South African Private University. The Journal of Social Sciences Research, 6(4), 406-412.
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472
https://www.tuik.gov.tr/ (Erişim Tarihi: 09.04.2024).
https://languages.oup.com/google-dictionary-tr/ (Erişim Tarihi: 02.04.2024).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 JOURNAL OF WORLD WOMEN STUDIES
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
